That’s because, by definition, revisionisat history is bunk. The difference between proper history and revisionist history is proper methodology and research — properly explored, history changed is merely history updated. Revisionism is to history like empiricism is to science — it might LOOK right, but its worthless speculation, and most commonly insulting to one or more peoples Its the bastion of intellectual laziness and fanatical pigheadedness to deny truthand Occam’s Razor and reach to conspiracy and hate…

This entry was posted in Old Blog. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>