I don’t mean to get into a rant here, but as someone with years of experience of not getting an iota of female attention, I can rightly say that laddr fellow seems to be as much of a mysogynist (not a word I use lightly, if you know me) and diapassionate sex addict as any alcoholic outlaw biker.

The basic premise of women categorizing men within 10 seconds into ‘guys I’d sleep with’ and ‘guys I wouldn’t sleep with’ is sound, but I find this application of the theory refuses to take into account the ENTIRE notion of anything beyond immediate physical gratification — if you wanna vouch sociology, try getting an idea of social dynamics, and its material counterpart, evolution.

Of course, as a man with any animalistic urges toward sexual expression buried somewhere beneath the stratum one would expect to find dinosaur bones at, its not surprising I reach a different view than he — quite frankly, its the difference between thinking with brains and thinking with the genitalia.

(Oh, and my own scientific training has toward me that any theory postulated on such vocabulary as ‘whores’, ‘bitches’, and that perennial expression of dehumanization of a potential mate, a certain four-letter verb with a sound not unlike ‘truck’, is wholly void of true merit — much as one is expected to use proper terminology in expressing a concise case, one is likewise expected to avoid such crude, emotive language).

Of course, that’s just my opinion, and I could be wrong…